Numerous articles in KM summarise, challenge, or generate definitions of knowledge. In trying to (re)define knowledge, authors attempt to establish and fix an acceptable and manageable demarcation of knowledge. This paper examines these processes of conceptualising knowledge, and competing over meaning, in action. However, rather than endorsing the need for a single working definition of knowledge, it calls for a willingness to embrace alternative, and even apparently contradictory, viewpoints as a key component of knowledge generation. In making the case for an acceptance of multiplicity, this paper argues that a genuinely multidisciplinary field, such as KM at its best, should increase the ability to see through others’ eyes. It further contends that, if KM is to be sustained as a discipline, its future lies in not just multidisciplinarity but also interdisciplinarity. Recommending that the KM community avoids premature attempts to put important and abstract concepts into tightly logical but restrictive definitional boxes, it encourages creating spaces for contesting perspectives to be more fully considered.
|Keywords:||Knowledge Management, Communication, Metaphor, Multiplicity, Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity|
Doctoral Student, Management Communication, Waikato Management School, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand
There are currently no reviews of this product.Write a Review